feel the need for the chef to have to justify his actions.
What The Staff Canteen followers had to say
Is a trial shift for chefs the equivalent of an interview in other industries? Or is it free labour which can help you out if you are short of staff? We took to social media to see what our followers thought about having people come in for unpaid trial shifts before offering them a permanent position.
But while most commended his actions on his original post we received a mixed reception when we shared The Times' piece on Facebook asking for your opinions.
It appears that most of the back lash has come from hospitality workers feeling it is unfair to get people in for trial shifts to help out during busier periods, regardless as to whether or not they are being paid.
Especially when the younger generation of chefs are finding it difficult to live on the starting wage.
Renowned chef, Pierre Koffmann, who celebrates 50 years in the industry this year, recently spoke out about this saying that young chefs find it ‘impossible’ to live off their wage in London and compared it to ‘living in poverty’.
But for those who read his original post, Mark made it clear how he felt about those thinking he was taking advantage and why he thought it was unfair to be singled out for something that is largely considered ‘legal’ in the cheffing community.
He said: “We do not and never have done this to get free labour or to fill a labour gap.”
He continued: “What I will always do is defend not only my restaurant, my team and lastly my reputation as an employer…”
Many agreed and revealed how they would not have the career they have today if it wasn't for taking up unpaid trial shifts in kitchens.
Do you agree with Mark? Please let us know your thoughts on unpaid trial shifts in the comments box or head over to our Facebook page or follow us on Twitter @canteentweets
By Michael Parker
@canteenparker