Australians are still eating out, but the way they spend has shifted.
New data from Lightspeed Commerce points to a pattern most operators already recognise on the floor. Covers are holding. Spend per head is not behaving the way it used to.
One number stands out. Around 35% of diners are now skipping dessert, with budget, health and energy all cited as reasons. For kitchens built around a three-course flow, that is a direct hit to how revenue is structured.
It sits alongside a broader shift. Younger diners are drinking less, venues are seeing fewer drinks per cover, and demand for high-volume formats like bottomless packages has softened. None of this is dramatic in isolation. Together, it changes the economics of a service.
The same data suggests Australians are still dining out regularly, averaging multiple meals out each month. But the shape of the spend has changed, and that has consequences for how kitchens and floors are run.
Where chefs feel it first
Dessert is often the first place the shift shows up.
Pastry sections carry real labour, prep time and ingredient cost. If a third of your covers are not ordering dessert, the question becomes whether the section still justifies the space and effort it takes to run.
Some kitchens are already adjusting. Shorter menus. Fewer composed plates. A tighter focus on one or two desserts that can be executed consistently and deliver margin. Others are moving sweets into bar or snack formats rather than treating them as a formal final course.
For chef-owners, the maths is simple. If conversion drops, the section has to work harder or be rethought. Carrying multiple desserts that sell to a minority of the room is becoming harder to justify.
The drinks question
The alcohol shift creates a different kind of pressure.
Beverage has traditionally carried margin. When guests order fewer drinks, that gap has to be made up somewhere else. That might mean food pricing, stronger non-alcoholic programs, or a more realistic view of what a profitable cover looks like without wine.
The venues navigating this best are treating non-alcoholic drinks as a proper category. That means considered pricing, presentation and placement on the menu, not just a token option.
It also means recognising that the old model of relying on beverage to carry the margin is not as consistent across every demographic as it once was.
Takeaway isn’t going away
Takeaway and delivery continue to hold a significant share of revenue, with a large portion of Australians ordering at least weekly.
For kitchens, that creates tension. Most are designed to plate, not pack. Takeaway introduces packaging costs, workflow changes, and removes control over how the food is ultimately experienced.
But the demand is steady, and the revenue is meaningful.
The difference tends to come down to intent. Kitchens that design menus specifically for takeaway, with dishes that travel well and margins that account for packaging and platform fees, tend to perform better than those pushing their full dine-in menu through delivery apps.
What this adds up to
None of these shifts point to a decline in dining out.
They point to a reset in how guests choose to spend. Fewer add-ons. More selective ordering. A clearer focus on value.
For operators, that means rethinking menu structure, section staffing and where margin is actually coming from.
The patterns are already visible in service. The data simply confirms it.
Download the full Lightspeed Commerce report
