offer it as a good price; so we feel we don’t want to change that limit at the moment.
What are the vast changes you’ve noticed since your time at being at the guide?
It’s the industry that’s changed, the chefs and the restaurants dictate the style of operation. We’re observers of what they are doing and we have noticed a change but we have been at the forefront of that for many years, and I don’t think it’s ever been a more exciting time to eat.
We’d like to see a bit more of a spread from London, certainly London is envied by many of my colleagues all around the world because we’ve got this great diversity and cross section of places to go and eat in.

Certainly the pubs have been fantastic and we’ve got well over a dozen restaurants with a star in a pub and we always wanted that to happen. We didn’t want them to be serving pigeon and foie gras but we wanted good fish and chips, but if they are part of the Home Counties and that’s what their locals want then they should do that.
Our philosophy has always been the same, and it’s been very successful: we pay our own bills we employ serious, professional, experienced inspectors and we invest them by sending them all over the world and building up their vast bank of experiences.
When we awarded two stars to The Hand and Flowers we knew that
Tom Kerridge was really at the forefront; he really was the best chef in a pub. I think others have followed with that decision and I’m very happy that we made it.
With the rise of food blogs and review sites is there still the same amount of need for the guide?
If anything I think it’s become more relevant as people lead busier lives. It’s great there are some fantastic amateurs out there, people know an awful lot about food and we never underestimate that.
We have always received correspondence from our readers and whether that’s been in an old fashioned letter or the questionnaire that we put in our guide, they’re always acknowledged by us; but it’s the inspector’s experiences that really rule the day and the decisions we make in our guide.
I think it’s become a little bit confusing out there and some people can say it’s fantastic about a particular establishment whilst others say it was dreadful and people don’t really know which way they are going. With our guide they know that places can’t pay to go in, that we are completely independent and we change our selection every year.

Whilst there may be a feeling that an annual publication can be slightly out of date we know that these businesses are established and they’ve reached a level. So if anything the guide has become more popular as people want this instant decision and this reliability rather than sifting through so many comments.
This must be the same with social media?
We’re going to be launching Twitter from an inspector’s point of view before the guide comes out. It’s already been established with our colleagues in America and the French site started up in February just before their launch; so it’s going to be quite new for us.
It’s been called for for quite some time now but this is purely from the inspectors’ point of view, this isn’t a corporate site. This will be a bit of a balance as we will be talking about places that aren’t in the guide, plus existing places and talking about the whole of the country. So we will have some input on that side of things which will again assist our readers even more.
All of the guides are available on the internet but we will still produce paper guides but I’m sure our entry into Twitter is just going to help us grow and grow.
The Michelin Guide 2015 is out on the 25th September.
We also looked at the impact of Michelin stars on a business - have a read here